"Rights are too slippery to define, either in terms of us having them or not. Does the foetus have a right to life or the woman the right not have the rapist's child? My answer favours the woman's choice, but does not address the issues of the sanctity of life. It doesn't get much easier on the right to be heard either."
-- It is not the "Rapist's child". It is simply, a child. No person born to this date had the ability to choose their parent(s). In this country a woman has the right to murder her unborn children. I am not that woman and cannot make that choice for her but I do not appreciate the government telling me I must pay for it.
Two of my children were the result of rape. It was against all odds, family and societal pressures that these young women decided to give birth to the second victim of that rape. I am very thankful they did. They were also born interracial and I am very thankful for that as well. When the other five couples ahead of us on the list heard that the forthcoming child might be "Black" they backed out. We got him instead and the irony is he is blond and blue with perfect Afro features. My daughter is a beautiful Ebony with caucasian features. Unfortunately the "Pro-choice" people only seem to give the woman one choice.
With all of the tensions going on over here about "Black vs White" I am thankful I have chosen to be in the gray area. Accepting neither.
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to minds-eye+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
0 comentários:
Postar um comentário