more sense than most. I find intrigues on god usually banal. RP has
an interesting point here - that he can sound atheist (only if we
strip his prose of god words as Allan points out). One turn in such
matters is to consider thinking 'outside the head' - some tough
reading in Frege and Heidegger. This is something of a turn against
the comforts and illusions of psychologism, themselves perhaps a
result of the long use of instruments of torture in maintaining false
authority by religion. This is difficult work and I've not seen any
interest in this group.
A case of Vam not spam Gabby - get over being underwhelmed by it!
On Jan 22, 12:38 pm, Vam <atewari2...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yes, Gabby... but if the questions were clear, you could have answered
> instead of relating with me or my motives.
>
> On Jan 20, 9:40 pm, gabbydott <gabbyd...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Hello Vam, it is always interesting to observe how sometimes you still make
> > the mistake of replying to me. The motivation behind has become crystal
> > clear though.
>
> > On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 5:21 PM, Vam <atewari2...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Gabby...
>
> > > 1) Is your observation about my post ? If so, what, specifically ?
>
> > > 2) Are you referring to the link in my post as spam ? Spell it clear.
>
> > > On Jan 20, 3:14 am, gabbydott <gabbyd...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > Hello mods, please remove this SPAM and put back the square brackets.
>
> > > > On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 10:19 PM, Vam <atewari2...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > A choiceless God is shite...
> > > > > So there goes all such pontification !
>
> > > > > #DeepakMRanade's article "Uncovering Relative Truths"
> > > > > in @timesofindia neatly summarises the approach to Advaita,
> > > > > its conceptual layout. You are invited to discover the answers.
>
> > > > >http://epaper.timesofindia.com/Default/Scripting/ArticleWin.asp?From=.
> > > ..
>
> > > > > On Jan 19, 10:21 pm, archytas <nwte...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > Interesting RP. I'm atheist only in that I reject stories that are
> > > > > > full of holes, talking snakes and such. The Gnostics have it that
> > > > > > creation was a mistake - though I have no means to determine any
> > > truth
> > > > > > in this I am struck most argument can be undercut like this. I often
> > > > > > wonder what might explain why we don't just know what life is about
> > > > > > and how this might be explained.
>
> > > > > > On Jan 19, 10:59 am, RP Singh <123...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > I as a human have the choice , even if it is apparent and not real
> > > ,
> > > > > > > to do this or do that , that is, there is an element of
> > > uncertainty in
> > > > > > > my actions , but God has a steadfastness of purpose. God's will is
> > > > > > > sure and certain , the whole space-time continuum emanates from Him
> > > > > > > without any active choice on His part which raises the question of
> > > > > > > responsibility. God cannot be held responsible for any event as it
> > > > > > > happens without any wavering on His part , He has no choice and
> > > hence
> > > > > > > cannot be held responsible. This brings us to the question of
> > > > > > > worship , why worship a Being who has a fixed purpose ? In that
> > > case ,
> > > > > > > even though believing in a supreme Being and determinism , I can be
> > > > > > > called an atheist.
0 comentários:
Postar um comentário